Miley Cyrus must face lawsuit over claims she copied Bruno Mars hit

Miley Cyrus performing at the SNL50: The Homecoming Concert on Friday, February 14, 2025

Pop star Miley Cyrus lost an early bid to dismiss a lawsuit in California federal court that accused her of unlawfully copying Bruno Mars’ song “When I Was Your Man” for her number-one hit “Flowers.”

On Tuesday, US District Judge Dean Pregerson rejected Cyrus’ argument that Tempo Music Investments, which said it owns a share of the copyright in Mars’ song, could not bring the lawsuit.

Tempo is unaffiliated with Mars, who is not involved in the lawsuit.

Miley Cyrus lost a bid to dismiss a lawsuit accusing her of copying Bruno Mars’ song “When I Was Your Man” for her song “Flowers.” Kevin Mazur/Peacock via Getty Images

Spokespeople and attorneys for Cyrus’ label Sony Music did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision on Wednesday.

Tempo attorney Alex Weingarten of Willkie Farr & Gallagher said on Wednesday that the company is “thrilled but not the least surprised” by the decision and “extremely confident in prevailing” in the case.

Cyrus released “Flowers” on her 2023 album “Endless Summer Vacation.” “Flowers” has over 1 billion streams on Spotify and won the Song of the Year Grammy award in 2024.

Tempo sued Cyrus and Sony Music in September, arguing that “Flowers” duplicates “numerous melodic, harmonic and lyrical elements” of Mars’ “When I Was Your Man,” which topped the Billboard Hot 100 in 2013.

Tempo said in the complaint that it bought its share of “When I Was Your Man” from the song’s co-writer Philip Lawrence in 2020.


Bruno Mars singing into a microphone during the 67th Annual GRAMMY Awards in Los Angeles, California
The lawsuit claims that Cyrus’ song copies “numerous melodic, harmonic and lyrical elements” of Mars’ “When I Was Your Man.” Getty Images for The Recording Academy

Cyrus and her song’s co-writers asked the court in November to dismiss the claims against them, arguing that Tempo lacked standing to sue under US copyright law because it did not have “exclusive rights” to the song.

Pregerson ruled against Cyrus on Tuesday.

“Because Lawrence as a co-owner could sue for infringement, Tempo as co‐owner, in lieu of Lawrence, can sue for infringement without joining the other co‐owners,” Pregerson said.

Content shared from nypost.com.

Share This Article